Home Organic
Growth
Master
Planning
SEOMike
Portfolio
Professional
Background
Personal
Background
SEOMike
Blog
SEO
Services
 

Archive for the ‘Google’ Category

Using Google Search Suggest for a Long Term Study

Friday, February 26th, 2010

If you have a client that depends on seasonal trends, Google Search Suggest can be quite valueable.  Goolge Search Suggest gets some media attention from time-to-time for it’s strange suggestions so you might have heard of it.  You can see Suggest in action by starting to type a query in the Google search box and watching what phrases are suggested.  This can be entertaining, but there is a good use for it.

In the beginning, Search Suggest had a lag of about 30 days, but now the suggestions seem to be more real-time.  Since SEO efforts take a lot of time to achieve positioning, the search suggest can be a good tool to use for identifying phrases to promote for next year’s season.  Of course, you can’t promote for things that are flash-in-the-pan results, but overall you can identify new phrases that customers are using RIGHT NOW to look for the products you offer.  This can help you create contextually targeted content for the next season based on more than just your historical phrase usage research.

A good example that you can currently see in Google is Valentine’s related.  Beyond the phrase research you did to prepare your client for the Valentine’s buying frenzy, you can look at the search suggest box to see what phrases are being searched in the season.  You might find some gems that are popularly searched, but not often SEO’d.  This year’s trends show searches for homemade gifts, how to write poems, dinner ideas, etc. that you might otherwise not have considered in your optimization strategy.

Video SEO

Friday, February 19th, 2010

Because of a recent potential client, I’ve been looking more into video SEO than I had before.  I’ve been studying why some sites are successful in getting their videos into Google and why some are not.  According to a recent discussion on Search Engine Watch, videos are 53 times more likely to produce a first page result than traditional techniques.  I am not sure where they got their information, but I don’t think that’s quite accurate.  I think it may be accurate in the short-term and I think that’s how they are framing it.  Another thing I’ve noticed is a lot of talk about YouTube optimization.  I find it hard to agree that a good positioning in YouTube is all some people need to worry about.  Basically, by working to promote a video on YouTube, you are giving that brand more power in your market than your own website.  I don’t think that YouTube has the SEO benefits for a company that is commonly believed.  When a video is posted to YouTube, you’ve given them your asset and allow YouTube to place contextually relevant advertising alongside your video – most likely from your competition.

There are a few noteworthy things I found when I was doing my reading and I’d like to take a minute to talk about them.

It is true that Google is pushing SOME video to the top of the listings in SOME industries.  Unfortunately, it’s not ubiquitous.  For example, a search on “internet marketing” yields zero video results on the first page.  I know there is a wealth of video content on the subject.  A search on “Ford Taurus” also shows zero videos.  No videos reviewing the car, no video test drives, nothing.  A search for “president obama” yields news results and some images, but no video.  Another interesting thing is that neither set of results show any YouTube listings. However, a search for “Haiti earthquake” and “Olympics” both yield video results.  So, video, though powerful, seems to currently be relegated to news type results, how-to videos, and current events.  The moral of this story is to investigate your industry extensively with regard to video results before you make a grand plan on optimizing and submitting them.  We all know that Google presents different TYPES of results for different industries, and video might just not work if you are selling car parts.

One really great thing about video is how fast it comes into the results.  If you do have lots of video, and you do have a target audience that Google thinks would want video, you may be in luck.  For example, if your website is geared towards pushing video news, you’ve got a great opportunity to capture traffic from the organic listings in a hurry.  Remember though, video news is perishable so unless you have a very sustainable model to keep feeding videos, you will probably only experience a temporary spike of traffic while your video is relevant.

I find it interesting that videos generally get better positioning in search results because of what is known as “blended results.”  Blended results can contain real-time news rolls, (from twitter usually) image results, and video results.  The placement of videos on the page depends on what Google thinks is the most important for that niche.  If up to the minute news is deemed more important than video, the video results may be pushed down to the bottom of the page to let a real-time news roll from twitter have the more prominent position.

Another thing your video may compete with is the news results that Google puts towards the top of organic listings when it thinks it’s appropriate.

The huge amount of content available in video and it’s popularity make it impossible for the search engines to ignore.  Google has been trying – for over a year now – to get really good at transcribing the spoken word in a video in order to provide contextually relevant PAID ADS alongside the videos.  Google could make so much money if they could correctly place ads with video and not have to rely on the input from the video poster.  I’ll keep my eye on this as Google works it and perfects it.

There are other ways a video can help your website beyond just providing great content for users.  If you take the time, you can transcribe your video to help build the spiderable content on your website.  Remember, alone the video doesn’t have much to offer for the overall SEO of your website, but if you take the time to pull the great content from the spoken word, the video will not only yield great (albeit short-term) success in the search engines, but help with the overall SEO of the site.  Remember, the transcription has to be accessible to the search engines!  No frames or java pop-ups, etc.

I’ve also heard that Google has been trying to analyze videos for flat surfaces that they could insert product placement ads.  That opens very interesting potential revenue stream for video producers, but probably very little control of what is advertised.  I would be really interested to see how this comes out, if they continue to pursue it.

So, how do you get your videos into the search engines?  It’s not that difficult.  The search engines allow sites to submit video content in the form of an XML feed.  However, if not done properly, the videos probably won’t make it in to the index.  Each search engine has its own set of guidelines for content submission and format for the XML feed.  Also, with any kind of feed, the guidelines you see may not be the most up to date and your feed may be rejected for something they haven’t published yet.

An important thing to remember is that Google and other search engines are not very good at finding video on their own, let alone determining it’s content.  The only way you can depend on to get videos listed is to have them submitted, by someone who knows what they are doing.  Does that mean you have to hire a firm with gobs of video-specific experience?  Not really.  Since the underlying principals of organic SEO apply to video promotion, any seasoned pro SEO will be able to get great results.  Heck, selecting a firm with tons of video promotion experience might be a mistake in the long run.  I find that companies that specialize in one little niche of marketing tend lack the skills it takes to leverage the rest of the website’s marketing potential.  Your company may find that it’s “all-in” in one type of media or delivery method only to find that particular method evaporate overnight.  Then what?  If Google decides to move video results out of the organic results into their own set, will your company survive?  Will it be competitively placed in the remaining Google results?  If your video promotion partner doesn’t understand organic SEO and incorporate it into your campaign, then no.  You won’t be there.  Google flipped the switch one day putting video in the results… they can just as easily flip it off.

In conclusion, video content can be a powerful tool for your website’s success… if done correctly.  Currently there is such a huge opportunity for people to get it right because so many are getting it wrong.  Because of the increasing capabilities of computer hardware, and increasing bandwidth to homes, video is going to remain very powerful in the future, and may ultimately be the main focus of any internet marketing campaign.

Google Will Spoon-Feed Your News

Tuesday, April 28th, 2009

A story I found today made it on the homepage of Webmasterworld.com. I love it when that happens. Thewrap.com interviewed Eric Schmidt, Chairman of the Board and CEO of Google. In the interview Eric said “In about six months, [Google] will roll out a system that will bring high-quality news content to users without them actively looking for it.” Also, Google believes it will be able to sell premium ad space with this content. This is huge. Google is taking steps to be a major player in the news industry – an industry whose print model is failing. The timing is perfect. The AP has been complaining about websites needing to pay for the use of AP news on their sites. The demands for compensation is alienating site owners… guess who will step up to the plate? Yep. The more scary thing… how will the AP be able to compete as their online and print news delivery models fail? Will they still be able to afford to pay a preimum to reporters? Could they afford to out-bid Google?! Yep. Now you’re getting it. Google employs the reporters. Google decides based on your profile’s history what kind of news you’re interested in. Google runs ads along with their news to subsidise the program. Progress? Sure. Big Brother getting bigger? Yep. Brace yourselves for the Google News Channel. Kidding. (Kinda) (Read Thewrap.com article) (See the Webmasterworld.com thread)

Google Exploits

Tuesday, November 25th, 2008

Today I’m going to talk about a couple of things that Google is doing that I find quite surprising. Editing Google Local results, and entering SearchWiki reviews. As always, when experimenting with exploits use a site and google account you consider “disposable.” Once Mr. Cutts’ team sees what you are doing, you’re going to get nuked.

Editing Google Local Results
The ability to edit Google Local results is fairly new. It’s been talked about extensively in the SEO world and has been abused by spammers since its introduction. Basically, anyone who is signed in to a Google account can edit the details of an unclaimed business. The scope of what you are allowed to edit is pretty broad. You can change the listing’s title, phone number, address, web address, and type of business. This has been broadly abused by people hijacking the listings by entering their own phone numbers and web addresses. I did a little experimenting and found that you can edit quite a few of the listings before Google shuts down your Google account. Also, even though they disabled the account I experimented with, the changes stuck. You may only edit businesses that are unclaimed. If you own an online business, you’d better claim it before someone comes along and changes your info. It happened to Yahoo recently. I was surprised when I searched Pepsi co’s world headquarters and found that they have yet to claim their business listing. I thought about hijacking it for Coke, but I don’t really want all that attention. I also found these companies to be at risk: LA Times Headquarters, Sprint, Time Warner Cable, Verizon, Coca Cola, The United Nations, Apple Computer, and many more. Amazing. I guess I could get famous real quick, but at what price?
Another way you can mess with the local results is to review businesses and enter the URL of your website. Seek out sites that have had no reviews and put your URL first in your comment. Your URL (if short enough) will display below their listing even if other reviews are entered afterwards. It seems that the first review is the one that is always displayed. This works if the listing is unclaimed or not.

Google’s SearchWiki
Google’s latest thing is the ability to enter comments about URLs in the listings. Unfortunately this doesn’t have as broad a reach as the Google Local Hijacking. The edits can only be seen by the editor by default, but you can view other comments by clicking the link at the bottom of the search results that says “See all notes for this SearchWiki” I made a bunch of comments on some sites today as a test and have yet to see them show up in the results. It seems that the SearchWiki edits don’t show up as quickly as edits in Google Local. The SearchWiki is a good place to review another site by including your site’s URL. I’m guessing that Google will make global comments much easier to review after they figure out how to effectively fight spam. Better to get your comments in now while you can and they’ll probably be “Grandfathered” in to the results later, if you’re not TOO spammy.

Personalized Search
The SearchWiki is one of the first major steps towards personalized search. Personalized search is going to have a substantial impact on the world of SEO. However, with all the hype you have to remember that for the most part you have to be signed in to see the major impact of personalized search. Not everyone that uses Google has a user account and will be signed in. SEOs will still have to fight to obtain first page positioning, but the doom and gloom being touted by the SEO community might not be quite as severe as they predict. People are still going to search without being signed in, from multiple computers, with cookies blocked, etc. The real question is going to be how to get people to promote your site in their personalized search. To this point one of the big challenges of user interaction has been getting people to bookmark your site which is taken into account in the Google algorithm. Bookmarking is great but there wasn’t really all that much desperation surrounding the topic. I think there will be significant urgency to get users to promote sites to the top of personalized search, and possibly some incentives for users who do. How all that is going to work has yet to be seen though. I’m currently working on ways to get users to promote my sites to the top of their results. Trouble is that this personalized search thing hasn’t really saturated the public just yet and most of the people I talk to have no idea what it is.

Google Local Loophole

Monday, November 3rd, 2008

I found another loop-hole in Google Local last week. I was quite surprised to find this one. Haven’t they learned their lesson? I’m going to sic a couple of people on this one and see what kind of results we get. It also gave me an idea for a good legit use of Google Local that I’m going to launch soon. Anyway, I’ve been keeping a close eye on the local spam issue that I talked about in an earlier post. Seems that they’ve gotten that perticular abuser pretty well knocked out. Problem is that some people, like me, looked at what that abuser did and figured out how to do it better and more “quietly.” Good luck rooting my sites out of the local results!

Google Mixing Results With Previous Searches

Thursday, September 25th, 2008

There are more interesting things going on with Google lately. Here are some of the highlights:
Google is experimenting with mixing adwords results based on previous searches. I saw this yesterday, but GreyWolf beat me to it by a couple days. Interesting thing though. If you search “red shoes” and then search “house plants” you’ll see adwords results from your “red shoes” query mixed in.

If you are signed in to your Google account Google will customize your search results based on previous queries. If you search two related terms Google modifies the second set of results to reflect both search terms. You can see this if you’re signed in to your Google account and search “buy a car” and then “buy an automobile.” This can have some big implications for SEOs if it is applied to the general SERPs. However, for those of us that focus on the long and short tails of search, it shouldn’t be a problem.

Google’s index update continues. The number of results in one of my niches varies by as much as 33%! This happens several times throughout the day. There are some real interesting things being experimented with here. One part of the algorithm that they have been tweaking a lot is the consideration that they give to historical ranking. If a site ranks in a certain spot for a long time, it’s hard to climb from that spot. I’ve noticed this being lifted and turned back on a bunch. I hope it goes back to “lifted” for the sake of one of my sites.

Google’s patent 7346839 was released recently. It’s a pretty old application but it’s neat to read it and see how the different things have been implemented since then. If you know what you’re looking for, there is some really good info in there.

I’ve been playing with ISAPIRewrite lately. It’s a pretty slick little thing. I like that you can quickly create a rule to rewrite non-www to www and have the server deliver a 301 for any non-www request. Good stuff. After a little reading, it’s actually real easy to setup and a good solution for IIS server admins needing to implement mod_rewrite style conditional rewrites. (no, I’m not using it to cloak anything.)
Still using Chrome some. I’m finding some little annoyances with the browser. One annoyance is the fact that it doesn’t support full 256bit encryption on SSL. Bummer. Market share for Chrome is dwindeling after the inital boom.

Google Enters the Browser Wars

Tuesday, September 2nd, 2008

So, Google throws itself into the browser war. Introducing Google Chrome, AKA Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US) AppleWebKit/525.13 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/0.2.149.27 Safari/525.13.

Google’s live webcast announcement was rather lengthy and included a pretty good Q&A session. I don’t have a lot of time right now to opine about every feature, but here are some of the notes I took during the webcast:

  • “Very simple experience with a sophisticated core.”
  • “Browsers should not be self-important.”
  • Chrome has no dialogue boxes you have to interact with the user.
  • Chrome has what they call an “Omnibox.” The Omnibox takes either web addresses or search queries so there is no longer a need for two separate text boxes in a browser.
  • Chrome has a completely new architecture. Web browsers have been based on the same technology since the very beginning of the web. Chrome is a completely new design instead of a bloating of existing code.
  • Chrome is not 100% standards compliant, but if a page renders correctly in Safari, it’ll work in Chrome.
  • Each tab runs in its own process. If one tab crashes, it doesn’t take the whole browser with it.
  • Since each tab runs its own process, each tab is sandboxed.
  • The rendering engine for Chrome is also sandboxed. This helps increase security by stripping the rendering engine of permissions to change the system.
  • “Tabs should be more than an element, but a main functionality.”
  • Chrome collects a LOT of data about you when you surf. I find this a little troubling. It’s got to be feeding a lot of great data into adsense and adwords to help display ads more effectively.
  • Chrome “phones home” to sbl.google.com.
  • Chrome has a feature called Incognito that is a separate window that records no information about your surfing.
  • Chrome can use “Application windows” that will allow you to load pages you use frequently into their own window to make them look more like a regular windows app. Works great with Pandora and Gmail. These windows have no navigation buttons and are also included in your ALT+TAB menu for fast switching.
  • Chrome notices built in site searches and will allow you to search them from the Omnibox.
  • Can just click to download or open a file on the web. No dialogue boxes.
  • Chrome does not currently support browser extensions.
  • Chrome has an element inspector similar to the Safari one.
  • Chrome, if it gets distribution, is a threat to FireFox.
  • Astute people noticed that Chrome was available for download about 15 minutes early.

During my hour of extensive “ahem” testing so far, I find the browser quite capable. I have some friends who are reporting problems getting the browser through their corporate firewall and some people reporting that the download isn’t working. Probably because they didn’t notice that Chrome was out there 15 minutes early and now it’s getting slammed for downloads. I’ll keep playing with the browser and see if I can break it. So far I like it a lot.

Google’s DCs Still Out of Sync

Tuesday, August 12th, 2008

The latest update of Google’s algorithm is quite interesting. I’ve been seeing a lot of changes and almost everything is being updated. I’ve had sites sit stagnant for months and now everything is changing. The backlink counts reported by Google’s Webmaster Tools (WMT) have changed significantly with some of my sites seeing gains in backlink counts of over 580%. I see the link counts updated almost weekly now in WMT. The sites with the biggest improvement in link counts are having the biggest jumps in position. Duh. One thing I’m still waiting for is a visible PR update. Usually I see those near the end of an algorithm change. It’s almost like a topping off of the new index. Another thing that I find interesting is that the datacenters are STILL out of sync. I’ve been watching the latest changes since they started in July and after all this time the updated hasn’t propagated. It’s probably because some old penalties have been lifted. I’ll bet Google is doing Multi Variant Testing (MVT) with their algorithm to see which version is delivering the best results to their users.

More good news… I’m number one again for the Google search “Kansas City Internet Marketing.” I like the traffic and new opportunities that position brings.

Big Changes in Google

Monday, May 19th, 2008

Sorry for the long delay in an update. May has been a crazy month because of a Google update. One of my niches went from 15,900,000 results for the main keyword down to 5,000,000 in one day, then came back up the next. Since that have been at #1 for a LONG time are now getting bumped. My sites are fluctuating all over the place and I’m hoping that they will settle into a good position. If not in this update, hopefully the next one. I have only been working on some of these sites in my ultra-competitive niche for about six months, so I’m not holding my breath for stellar results yet. Sure, I could black-hat the crap out of a site and watch it succeed for a week or two, but I want one that will be well positioned for a long time. Good long term positioning takes a long time.

One of the biggest challenges I’m facing right now in this industry is the ability to build an effective linking campaign. Sure, I could buy all the links I want but that’s got two problems; 1. it’s a short-sighted solution that is bound to get slammed sooner or later and 2. buying enough links in this category significantly compresses profits. It compresses profits so much that if you aren’t in a great position for an awesome keyword, you are just going to hemorrhage money.

I am still having a good time editing categories in DMOZ. It’s a lot of work though. So many people submit such crappy sites with such crappy descriptions that it takes quite a while to dig through them all. It’s still fun though and I’m hoping to add some more categories soon.
I’m off to go backpacking in the Cranberry Wilderness this memorial day weekend starting this Wednesday. The weather is supposed to be absolutely beautiful with high in the low to mid 70s. After I get back, I’m working for two days then we’re having a company lake day. After that I leave for SMX Advanced the following week. Wheew! Lots of traveling! Lots more traveling to come this summer too! Good times!

Google Says No Manual Updates to Index… Yeah Right.

Thursday, April 17th, 2008

Today I saw an interview in Popular Mechanics with Google’s Guru of search: Udi Manber. It is extremely rare to see an interview with him so I was quite pleased when I stumbled upon it. There were some pretty interesting things in the article and I found one statement particularly interesting. He said “At Google we do not manually change results.” What’s that? Really? They say this all the time, but I just don’t believe it. I made a post on WebmasterWorld on 3/6 and also discussed it here. You can’t tell me that in a matter of about 30 minutes that they were able to tweak the algorithm, push it out to over 700 different datacenters, and have it go live. Google might be a technology giant, but I seriously doubt that even they can manipulate their index that quickly… unless of course, they do it by hand.
Anyway, here’s the full article.