Comments for SEOMike Search Marketing Blog

Comment on This Post Sponsored By Google by SEOMike

SEOMike — Wed, 04 Jan 2012 16:31:51 +0000

This issue caused quite the uproar in the SEO world. As I thought, Google said “this isn’t what we signed up for” and quickly threw Unruly under the bus. They also depreciated the Chrome page for 60 days as a result. Here are a couple of good follow-up articles: http://searchengineland.com/google-yes-sponsored-post-campaign-was-ours-but-not-what-we-signed-up-for-106457 and http://searchengineland.com/google-chrome-page-will-have-pagerank-reduced-due-to-sponsored-posts-106551

Comment on This Post Sponsored By Google by smbookmarks.com

smbookmarks.com — Tue, 03 Jan 2012 18:45:32 +0000

This Post Sponsored By Google « SEOMike Search Marketing Blog…

Interesting article/comment on Google Chrome. It doesn’t make sense that Google would use a pay per post campaign. They are GOOGLE after all. I’m sure they can create enough “buzz” on their own….

Comment on Google Launches Boutiques.com by Messing With Google Image Search « SEOMike Search Marketing Blog

Messing With Google Image Search « SEOMike Search Marketing Blog — Fri, 09 Sep 2011 21:26:08 +0000

[...] in 2010 I talked about Google launching Boutiques.com. Boutiques.com (a Google property) is a neat site where you can put together an outfit that match [...]

Comment on Why Pick Google+ for the Name? by smbookmarks.com

smbookmarks.com — Tue, 19 Jul 2011 16:09:31 +0000

Why Pick Google+ for the Name? « SEOMike Search Marketing Blog…

In SEOMike’s blog he asks the question of how Google+ got it’s name. His theories are interesting….

Comment on Robots.txt Broke and My Site Tanked by SEOMike

SEOMike — Sun, 17 Jul 2011 02:55:49 +0000

Our site came back – but sadly not to #1. It’s now at #2 and will require a lot of work to bump back up to #1. Glad to have it fixed though.

Comment on Time Warner Cable Fail by Glenn Williams

Glenn Williams — Sat, 09 Jul 2011 14:15:32 +0000

I agree. The problem with chrome was formally reported over a year ago to Time Warner, and they have steadfastly ignored any complaints, requests or pleas!

Comment on Google Advanced Search Operators by electron

electron — Sat, 09 Jul 2011 08:37:20 +0000

Nice post, this will help me a lot,thanks.

Comment on Browser Ubiquity Testing by Time Warner Cable Fail « SEOMike Search Marketing Blog

Time Warner Cable Fail « SEOMike Search Marketing Blog — Wed, 06 Jul 2011 21:59:32 +0000

[...] awful site speed, clunky design, and late-notice of an incompatible browser. I have talked about browser testing before, and will continue to call out companies that employ web-amateurs instead of webmasters. [...]

Comment on Internet Explorer 9 Is Here by Time Warner Cable Fail « SEOMike Search Marketing Blog

Time Warner Cable Fail « SEOMike Search Marketing Blog — Wed, 06 Jul 2011 21:49:03 +0000

[...] that a company would spend all that time and money making their site work in Internet Explorer (which is still a bad browser) but neglect to include Google Chrome. Anyway, then I tried logging on to the website with IE9 so [...]

Comment on Browser Ubiquity Testing by Glenda

Glenda — Mon, 30 May 2011 17:56:39 +0000

This is so frustrating, why can’t all sites work in all browsers? [A game site] for instance, in Opera and Firefox, it tells me my players has not installed correctly to restart my comptuer or uninstall and then reinstall it. So then I go to IE to find the game I want and download it, in IE it says it’s in Queue, but it never downloads. Really really really frustrating.

I have to do the same thing on my laptop but it DOES download using IE but no other browser. Why can’t these developers get together and make all sites work in all browsers? I hate having to open different browsers to see certain sites or download certain things.