Home Organic
Growth
Master
Planning
SEOMike
Portfolio
Professional
Background
Personal
Background
SEOMike
Blog
SEO
Services
 

Google’s April Fool’s Fun

April 1st, 2010
April Fools!
Google’s April Fool’s day joke this year was pretty amusing to this Kansan.
Last month the city of Topeka, the capitol of Kansas, officially changed it’s name to Google for a month in an effort to attract attention and win the bid to be the first city where Google tests their ultra-high speed internet service.  In an April Fool’s Day response, Google changed their name to Topeka.
x; width: 1px; height: 1px; overflow-x: hidden; overflow-y: hidden;”>Google Employees lined the street in front of the Mountain View CA headquarters.  Check out the screenshots I took with streetview:
Another amusing aspect of Google’s April Fool’s Day shanagans, is the fact that all of their search response times have been changed to other units of measure like (2.00 shakes of a lamb’s tail).  Here’s a list of the response times I recorded:
60.35 jiffies (interesting because this appears to be calibrated correctly.  A jiffy about 1 millisecond, and Google’s usual response times are 6-8 milliseconds.  So, the response time of 60.35 jiffies is equal  to about  6 milliseconds.  Nice Google)
0.74 times the velocity of a unladen swallow
0.23 centons
0.07 nanocenturies
1.22e-15 epochs
23.00 skidoo
0.22 microfortnights
0.19 centibeats
0.26 microweeks
2.00 shakes of a lamb’s tail
0.32e+43 Planck times (interestingly a jiffy used to mean Planck time)
at 5.21 hertz
1.21 gigawatts
11.90 parsecs
0.02 femtogalactic years
Another funny thing Google did on April Fool’s 2010 is post a promo saying that you can store anything on Google Documents, even your car keys.  ”Ever wish you could CTRL+F your keys?”  (Link)
Other Google April Fool’s pranks that get an honorable mention:
Google Maps in 3D
Google Books in 3D
Google standard voicemail: http://www.google.com/googlevoice/standard_voicemail.html
Google Translate for Animals (offered on google.co.uk)

Last month the city of Topeka, the capitol of Kansas, officially changed it’s name to Google for a month in an effort to attract attention and win the bid to be the first city where Google tests their ultra-high speed internet service.  In an April Fool’s Day response, Google changed their name to Topeka.

The April Fool’s idea that made me smile most was that the Google Employees lined the street in front of the Mountain View CA headquarters.  Check out the screenshots I took with streetview:

I also spotted a guy in the crowd with a marriage proposal sign:

Another amusing aspect of Google’s April Fool’s Day shanagans, is the fact that all of their search response times have been changed to other units of measure like (2.00 shakes of a lamb’s tail).  Here’s a list of the response times I recorded:

  • 60.35 jiffies (interesting because this appears to be calibrated correctly.  A jiffy about 1 millisecond, and Google’s usual response times are 6-8 milliseconds.  So, the response time of 60.35 jiffies is equal  to about  6 milliseconds.  Nice Google)
  • 0.74 times the velocity of a unladen swallow
  • 0.23 centons
  • 0.07 nanocenturies
  • 1.22e-15 epochs
  • 23.00 skidoo
  • 0.22 microfortnights
  • 0.19 centibeats
  • 0.26 microweeks
  • 2.00 shakes of a lamb’s tail
  • 0.32e+43 Planck times (interestingly a jiffy used to mean Planck time)
  • at 5.21 hertz
  • 1.21 gigawatts
  • 11.90 parsecs
  • 0.02 femtogalactic years

Another funny thing Google did on April Fool’s 2010 is post a promo saying that you can store anything on Google Documents, even your car keys.  “Ever wish you could CTRL+F your keys?”

Other Google April Fool’s pranks that get an honorable mention:

The Importance of Valid HTML

March 30th, 2010
Valid HTML is the best practice when it comes to websites.  Though it can be difficult, it is worth the time.   If your code is valid, it won’t have to be auto-corrected by browsers and it won’t cause problems with search engine robots.
I’ve talked about browser ubiquity link testing before and the importance of working out problems with code to make sure a site renders correctly in browsers.  To sum up, when code is written correctly a web browser doesn’t have to interpret and correct it.
If web browsers can do their own code correction, why is validating the code important?  Browsers can correct code, search engine robots cannot.  They are left to fend for themselves without that advanced feature.  This can cause problems with them parsing your site in full and finding all the content on a page.  The spiders may get stuck on a piece of messed up code and stall which will eat up the time they have to spend on your site.
There are several tools available to help validate your code and the best one comes from the W3C (World Wide Web Consortium) site link .   The W3C is in charge of writing standards for web code and has played a key role in the development of the internet as we know it.  They know what they are talking about.
Correcting the code can be a real headache if you’re not really good at coding so I recommend contracting a web developer to help.  A good web developer is an expert in this kind of thing and the process will take a lot less time than a novice trying to work it out.

Valid HTML is the best practice when it comes to websites.  Though it can be difficult, it is worth the time.   If your code is valid, it won’t have to be auto-corrected by browsers and it won’t cause problems with search engine robots.

I’ve talked about browser ubiquity testing before and the importance of working out problems with code to make sure a site renders correctly in browsers.  To sum up, when code is written correctly a web browser doesn’t have to interpret and correct it.

If web browsers can do their own code correction, why is validating the code important?  Browsers can correct code, search engine robots cannot.  They are left to fend for themselves without that advanced feature.  This can cause problems with them parsing your site in full and finding all the content on a page.  The spiders may get stuck on a piece of messed up code and stall which will eat up the time they have to spend on your site.

There are several tools available to help validate your code and the best one comes from the W3C (World Wide Web Consortium).   The W3C is in charge of writing standards for web code and has played a key role in the development of the internet as we know it.  They know what they are talking about.

Correcting the code can be a real headache if you’re not really good at coding so I recommend contracting a web developer to help.  A good web developer is an expert in this kind of thing and the process will take a lot less time than a novice trying to work it out.

Broken Links = Broken Site

March 26th, 2010
Another new client comes on and reminds me of the importance of the basics.  The site I’m reviewing for the first time has almost 500 broken links.  That’s right, five HUNDRED.  The client came on reporting virtually no representation in the search engines.  I’m starting to see why.  Code that doesn’t validate, content in iframes, and a ton of broken links.  Though there are a lot of factors that I think are keeping them down, I’m just going to focus on broken links in this post though.
So, what are broken links and how do you find them?  Broken links are any kind of link that doesn’t deliver the expected page.  The link could fail because of a typo in the or because the target page has moved.  There are two major problems with having a lot of broken links on a website;  1. The users can’t get to content you want them to find and,  2.  The search engines get stuck in these “spider traps” and burn all their time waiting for a 404, 403, or 500a response.  Both problems affect a site’s positioning in the index because the search engines want to present their users with sites that work.  Also, the search engine bots will never discover all of your site’s content if they are stuck waiting for an error from a broken link.
In the case of my new client, there’s no way to go through it by hand to find every broken link.  It would take weeks.  The best way to do find them is to run a spider against the site, like Xenu, and let it do all the checking for you.  (I’ll make another post about Xenu at some point with tips on it’s operation, but for now I’ll say that you shouldn’t run it full-throttle against a site because your IP might get blocked for a DOS attack. link to wiki on dos)  Xenu will check every link to see if it works and will report the response.  After the report runs, you’ll have a nice list of broken links and the pages where they are listed.  Keep in mind though that Xenu doesn’t click on every link.  Some older versions won’t work with java onclick attributes and Xenu certainly won’t click in flash elements.
Now that you’ve got your broken link report, what should you do?  Fix them!  You have to go through each link and try to figure out what went wrong with that link.  Was the HTML fat-fingered?  Was the link copied incorrectly from a browser address bar?  Was the page moved?  What error does the server deliver?  Once you’ve figured out what is wrong with the broken link, you can try to fix it.  If the HTML was fat-fingered, just correct the problem and you should be good.  If something else happened to the link, try to find the correct target and replace it.  If you were deep-linking and the target no longer exists, try to find it on the site in an archive or something.  If you were citing some other site’s article and that article doesn’t exist, it’s still good practice to give a link to their homepage as credit for the citation.
If you’re an SEO correcting links for a client, it’s important to have a good report for them including recommendations for what they should change in their site editing / page creation policies to prevent it from happening again.  Oh, and don’t forget to run Xenu against the site again when the corrections have been made.  If they got messed up one time, they could get messed up again.

Another new client comes on and reminds me of the importance of the basics.  The site I’m reviewing for the first time has almost 500 broken links.  That’s right, five HUNDRED.  The client came on reporting virtually no representation in the search engines.  I’m starting to see why.  Code that doesn’t validate, content in iframes, and a ton of broken links.  Though there are a lot of factors that I think are keeping them down, I’m just going to focus on broken links in this post though.

What are broken links and how do you find them?  Broken links are any kind of link that doesn’t deliver the expected page.  The link could fail because of a typo or because the target page has moved.  There are two major problems with having a lot of broken links on a website;  1. The users can’t get to content you want them to find and,  2.  The search engines get stuck in these “spider traps” and burn all their time waiting for a 404, 403, or 500a response.  Both problems affect a site’s positioning in the index because the search engines want to present their users with sites that work.  Also, the search engine bots will never discover all of your site’s content if they are stuck waiting for an error from a broken link.

In the case of my new client, there’s no way to go through it by hand to find every broken link.  It would take weeks.  The best way to do find them is to run a spider against the site, like Xenu, and let it do all the checking for you.  (I’ll write another post about Xenu at some point with tips on it’s operation, but for now I’ll say that you shouldn’t run it full-throttle against a site because your IP might get blocked for a DOS attack.)  Xenu will check every link to see if it works and will report the response.  After the report runs, you’ll have a nice list of broken links and the pages where they are listed.  Keep in mind though that Xenu doesn’t click on every link.  Some older versions won’t work with java onclick attributes and Xenu certainly won’t click in flash elements.

Now that you’ve got your broken link report, what should you do?  Fix them!  You have to go through each link and try to figure out what went wrong with that link.  Was the HTML fat-fingered?  Was the link copied incorrectly from a browser address bar?  Was the page moved?  What error does the server deliver?  Once you’ve figured out what is wrong with the broken link, you can try to fix it.  If the HTML was fat-fingered, just correct the problem and you should be good.  If something else happened to the link, try to find the correct target and replace it.  If you were deep-linking and the target no longer exists, try to find it on the site in an archive.  If you were citing another site’s article and that article no longer exists, it’s still good practice to give a link to their homepage as credit for the citation.

If you’re an SEO correcting links for a client, it’s important to have a good report for them including recommendations for what they should change in their site editing / page creation policies to prevent it from happening again.  Oh, and don’t forget to run Xenu against the site after the corrections have been made.  If they got messed up one time, they could get messed up again.

Link Campaign Sustainability

March 18th, 2010

When planning a link campaign it’s important to set some goals for the campaign so you can accurately track progress.  You can’t just wing it.  You need to be precise in how you target your campaign or else it will look artificial, or worse yet, spammy.

The best method for tracking your link campaign, as far as I’m concerned, is a good excel spreadsheet.  You should track where you found the link partner, what date you requested a link, when the link went live, the URL of the actual linking page, link type, the advertiser network (if relevant), and the last date you checked the link.  I found this to be quite useful when I had a text link campaign from a third party.  We would periodically review the campaign to make sure the links were live and found that we were paying a lot of money every month for links that were no on sites even though their system told them they were.

As the link campaign builds steam it’s important that you maintain the same pace throughout the campaign.  The number of link acquisitions in a period is tracked by Google and it’s best to keep the linking campaign on a steady pace with no spikes or lags in activity.  This is why I keep a separate spreadsheet containing the number of links for a site on a given day and update that sheet daily.  Using the data I’ve collected I have excel create a line chart of the number of links over time, then apply a trend-line to it to set a goal for the campaign.  The trend-line will show if you are making the progress needed or not.

Another important thing to look at is the number and types of links that your competitors have.  Once you’ve established what they have you can try to build a similar campaign.  You should evaluate the number of links from each different PR, ie., 340 links from PR 2 pages, 400 from PR 0 pages, 65 from PR 5 pages, etc.  The goal is to make your link base look as natural as possible, yet still competitive, to avoid unwanted attention from Google.  Remember:  All sites will have a number of “nofollow” links pointing to them.  Best to keep that number on par also.

The last factor I’ll mention here is link decay.  A Google patent application I read mentioned the fact that Google evaluates the decay rate of a site’s link base.  You need to make sure that your decay rate isn’t too high.  Link decay is when Google can’t find a link on a page anymore.  This can happen when a blog entry that links to you moves off of the homepage and Google doesn’t see it anymore.

A sustainable link campaign is critical to long-term success of your SEO efforts.

Content Management Systems are supposed to make life easy. . .

March 4th, 2010

Content Management Systems (CMS) can make life easier for businesses that have no webmaster, or have thousands of pages that they need to organize.  However, a CMS comes at a steep price, both monetarily, and in restrictions.  There are so many inherent problems that choosing the right one is critical for the success of your website. I could go on and on and on about the problems I’ve had with CMSs over the years, but suffice it to say they are a total pain in the neck.

In the interest of keeping this somewhat short and not a soapbox rant, I will stick to a bullet-pointed list of things to think about when selecting a CMS.

  • Look for hidden fees for:
    • Page Editing
    • New Page Creation
    • File Uploads
    • Image Creation
    • Phone Tech Support
    • Email Tech Support
    • Yearly Licensing Fees
    • Software Update Fees
    • Bandwidth Overages
  • Do not work with a company that refuses to give you full admin rights.
  • Demand FTP access.
  • You must be able to edit the HTML of the pages and the page components. Period.  The only reason they wouldn’t want you to is so they can charge you to do it for you.
  • Do they own the artwork they create?
  • Ask for examples of current clients and have an SEO inspect their HTML.
  • Test the page-load times of the example websites.  If you don’t know how, your SEO will.
  • Don’t sign anything unless you get everything you want in writing.
  • Remember, if you design a site in a CMS, they’ve got you. There’s no leaving without a complete recoding of the site and potential loss of database info.
  • Will the CMS cost more than a good webmaster?
  • If your CMS is a hosted solution, make them give you a Service Level Agreement (SLA) in writing to guarentee uptime.
  • Beware of built-in SEO packages. They are usually designed by a programmer that has “some” SEO knowledge and not a true expert.  Bolt-on SEO packages never, ever, work well.
  • Ask for a demo of their product as you would see it and in a working environment. A CMS company will often let you test a feature-rich version of the software on their fastest server. The version and server you get may be significantly different.
  • Do you really need a CMS or are you being sold a CMS? Ask a professional SEO.
  • Have an IT guy check out their system. If you don’t have an IT guy, get one. A real one.
  • You should have contracted a professional SEO by now, get them involved before you buy.
  • Ask about guarenteed response times to support issues. If they don’t guarentee a resolution time, your issue may languish in tech support for months.
  • Ask who your main point of contact will be. It sure won’t be the salesman you’re talking to. Ask to speak with that rep and see if you can understand them. You know what I mean.
  • Ask about system backups.
  • Ask about system redundancy.
  • Ask about connection redundancy.
  • Ask about the project workflow for the site design.
  • Get a guaranteed completion date.
  • Ask to see their designer’s other work.
  • Make sure you aren’t limited to the number of design concepts you can go through. You may only get two, and if two isn’t enough, you will have to pay more.
  • Ask how their testing environment works. You need a production area to test pages before pushing them live.

There are good CMSs out there, but as a layperson they are hard to identify.  A CMS may be a very good fit for your company, but too often the decision to buy a CMS is made without consulting anyone “technical.”    If you are relying on the CMS company to be your technical person, remember, they are selling you a product.  You need an independent opinion.  When you’re talking to the CMS company you’re not talking to a technical person looking out for your company’s best interests, you’re talking to a salesman working for a commission.

What You Can Learn From Your (IP) Neighbors

March 2nd, 2010

What exactly are IP Neighbors?  An IP neighborhood of sites is made up of every website that shares an IP.  If you have a dedicated server that just hosts your site, there’s not much to worry about, but like most people who have shared hosting, there are some things you need to know.

First, you have to find your neighbors.  There are several tools online to find out what sites share an IP.  My favorite search is provided by DnsQueries.

If you have a shared server you need to find out what other sites share that IP with you.  If some other site is malicious and spamming or distributing viruses, spyware or malware, ISPs or search engines might block the whole IP and your site would be affected.  If you find that the other sites on your shared server are spamming or doing other unsavory things, you need to move hosts.

Another reason it’s good to know who your neighbors are is because of the load they put on the server and the internet connection.  If you share a server with video sites or super-flash heavy sites with lots of traffic, your site’s performance may be reduced.  If the server admin hasn’t properly set resource limits for each site on the server, the other sites will hog the box and slow down delivery of your website.  That’s not fair.  You’re not getting what you pay for.

One final thing that I’ll say about the IP neighbor tool is that you can use it to “spy” on your competition.  If your SEO / design competition also provides hosting services, you can very quickly get a deep look into their client base.  That’s all I have to say about that.  ;-)

Most hosts won’t move your site to another server unless you really holler and complain.  Your best bet is to present strong documented proof  of why you want to move and tell them that if they don’t move you, you’re changing hosts.

In order to really understand what your IP neighbors are doing, I recommend that you hire an expert SEO to conduct the evaluation.  The SEO you choose should be able to do “forensic” style studies on your neighboring sites.  If you’re going to pin your hopes on the success of your beautiful website, you’d better have a clean place to put it.

Using Google Search Suggest for a Long Term Study

February 26th, 2010

If you have a client that depends on seasonal trends, Google Search Suggest can be quite valueable.  Goolge Search Suggest gets some media attention from time-to-time for it’s strange suggestions so you might have heard of it.  You can see Suggest in action by starting to type a query in the Google search box and watching what phrases are suggested.  This can be entertaining, but there is a good use for it.

In the beginning, Search Suggest had a lag of about 30 days, but now the suggestions seem to be more real-time.  Since SEO efforts take a lot of time to achieve positioning, the search suggest can be a good tool to use for identifying phrases to promote for next year’s season.  Of course, you can’t promote for things that are flash-in-the-pan results, but overall you can identify new phrases that customers are using RIGHT NOW to look for the products you offer.  This can help you create contextually targeted content for the next season based on more than just your historical phrase usage research.

A good example that you can currently see in Google is Valentine’s related.  Beyond the phrase research you did to prepare your client for the Valentine’s buying frenzy, you can look at the search suggest box to see what phrases are being searched in the season.  You might find some gems that are popularly searched, but not often SEO’d.  This year’s trends show searches for homemade gifts, how to write poems, dinner ideas, etc. that you might otherwise not have considered in your optimization strategy.

When to Stop Caching

February 23rd, 2010

We’ve all seen the little “cached” link in Google results.  This link can give some useful information for an SEO such as the most recent cache date which can be nice to keep track of so you can trend when Google caches your site.  If you know how often Google caches your site, you can judge the effectiveness of new campaigns and new content based on caching frequency.  A cache is also important so you can check out the text version of your site that Google has saved.  Looking at the text cache can help you troubleshoot content presentation problems, and see what content is not visible to Google because of frames, flash etc.  You can also identify what Google and other search engines think about your site navigation, internal linking structure, and outbound links.  Basically, there is a wealth of information to a skilled SEO.

If there’s so much good info, why would anyone want to block caching?  One reason; content ownership.  If your site offers some kind of service that is required to have certain phrasing in disclaimers, disclosures, etc. the Google cache can be dangerous because it can retain stale information if your terms change.  The real danger here is quite limited, but I worked with a client once where cached legal info was a problem and their attorneys needed to know how to get rid of it.

Another problem can arise from content scrapers.  There isn’t much you can do to prevent a content scraper from grabbing text from your site, but there are a few tricks you can use.  For the example above, I came up with a system so all of the client’s sites and pages contained a call to another server that would dynamically populate their legal disclaimers for pages.  We configured the server that provided the text to only accept requests from certain IPs (the website IPs) to prevent that include from working on other websites.  Most content scrapers just pull the HTML from a site and with this call, the legal info was contained in something that didn’t present scrapeable content.  The problem this client had was that scrapers were stealing and reproducing entire websites and impersonating the company.  This led to legal confusion and the lawyers wanted a way to protect against future scraping of the legal info.  Not only did the solution above ensure every one of the sites had up-to-date legal disclaimers, but it prevented scrapers from getting the content.

Another related challenge is a site called the Internet Archive that keeps a record of your site’s changes.  This site also contains a wealth of information and content that could be used against you.  A skilled SEO can look through the history of your site and reverse-engineer all the improvements you made to increase user conversion.  It’s really not all that difficult.  I could go to a competitor’s site in the Internet Archive and look at design changes they made to improve user conversion.  If I know the competitor and their target client well, I can find out all kinds of valuable information about user conversion improvement that the competitor probably spent a lot of money and time learning.  When I conduct User Funnel Improvement Research and Conversion Improvement Studies I usually start by digging through competition to see how they drive traffic into their high-value conversion pages.  I look at their current site design as well as their change history in the Internet Archive.  Starting from scratch on a multi-variant testing (MVT) campaign can be quite expensive so I use what I learn from competitors and improve it, then start my MVT from there.  By this time in my career, most conversion improvements are intuitive for me, but it’s still nice to look at where other companies are focusing their efforts.

The Internet Archive is especially useful for keeping tabs on other SEO firms that like to brag about their big clients and their latest client acquisitions.  If I know XYZ company has a big new client, I can watch the changes they make to see if there’s anything I can learn about their methods.  A tip for you: don’t advertise your new clients until AFTER you have your SEO improvements in place and the Internet Archive blocked.  This will make it more difficult for other SEO firms to track your changes.  Better still, keep under the radar and don’t talk about clients until you’re way into their campaign.

So, how do you stop Google and the Internet Archive from caching your critical, and expensive information?   Simple.   To stop the Internet Archiver from keeping a record of your site, simply block their user-agent in your Robots.txt.  This will also remove any previous records for your site in their archive.  The fix for Google is also pretty easy and can be controlled at the page-level with a robots “nocache” tag in the HEAD section of your page.  This should really only be used on pages that contain legally sensitive information that you don’t want cached, such as a “terms & conditions” page.

It’s important to protect your site from legal problems by taking every measure you can against scrapers.  This helps ensure the most up-to-date version of your information is available online.  Blocking the Internet Archive helps erase the bread crumb trail of improvements you have spent so much time and money implementing.

Video SEO

February 19th, 2010

Because of a recent potential client, I’ve been looking more into video SEO than I had before.  I’ve been studying why some sites are successful in getting their videos into Google and why some are not.  According to a recent discussion on Search Engine Watch, videos are 53 times more likely to produce a first page result than traditional techniques.  I am not sure where they got their information, but I don’t think that’s quite accurate.  I think it may be accurate in the short-term and I think that’s how they are framing it.  Another thing I’ve noticed is a lot of talk about YouTube optimization.  I find it hard to agree that a good positioning in YouTube is all some people need to worry about.  Basically, by working to promote a video on YouTube, you are giving that brand more power in your market than your own website.  I don’t think that YouTube has the SEO benefits for a company that is commonly believed.  When a video is posted to YouTube, you’ve given them your asset and allow YouTube to place contextually relevant advertising alongside your video – most likely from your competition.

There are a few noteworthy things I found when I was doing my reading and I’d like to take a minute to talk about them.

It is true that Google is pushing SOME video to the top of the listings in SOME industries.  Unfortunately, it’s not ubiquitous.  For example, a search on “internet marketing” yields zero video results on the first page.  I know there is a wealth of video content on the subject.  A search on “Ford Taurus” also shows zero videos.  No videos reviewing the car, no video test drives, nothing.  A search for “president obama” yields news results and some images, but no video.  Another interesting thing is that neither set of results show any YouTube listings. However, a search for “Haiti earthquake” and “Olympics” both yield video results.  So, video, though powerful, seems to currently be relegated to news type results, how-to videos, and current events.  The moral of this story is to investigate your industry extensively with regard to video results before you make a grand plan on optimizing and submitting them.  We all know that Google presents different TYPES of results for different industries, and video might just not work if you are selling car parts.

One really great thing about video is how fast it comes into the results.  If you do have lots of video, and you do have a target audience that Google thinks would want video, you may be in luck.  For example, if your website is geared towards pushing video news, you’ve got a great opportunity to capture traffic from the organic listings in a hurry.  Remember though, video news is perishable so unless you have a very sustainable model to keep feeding videos, you will probably only experience a temporary spike of traffic while your video is relevant.

I find it interesting that videos generally get better positioning in search results because of what is known as “blended results.”  Blended results can contain real-time news rolls, (from twitter usually) image results, and video results.  The placement of videos on the page depends on what Google thinks is the most important for that niche.  If up to the minute news is deemed more important than video, the video results may be pushed down to the bottom of the page to let a real-time news roll from twitter have the more prominent position.

Another thing your video may compete with is the news results that Google puts towards the top of organic listings when it thinks it’s appropriate.

The huge amount of content available in video and it’s popularity make it impossible for the search engines to ignore.  Google has been trying – for over a year now – to get really good at transcribing the spoken word in a video in order to provide contextually relevant PAID ADS alongside the videos.  Google could make so much money if they could correctly place ads with video and not have to rely on the input from the video poster.  I’ll keep my eye on this as Google works it and perfects it.

There are other ways a video can help your website beyond just providing great content for users.  If you take the time, you can transcribe your video to help build the spiderable content on your website.  Remember, alone the video doesn’t have much to offer for the overall SEO of your website, but if you take the time to pull the great content from the spoken word, the video will not only yield great (albeit short-term) success in the search engines, but help with the overall SEO of the site.  Remember, the transcription has to be accessible to the search engines!  No frames or java pop-ups, etc.

I’ve also heard that Google has been trying to analyze videos for flat surfaces that they could insert product placement ads.  That opens very interesting potential revenue stream for video producers, but probably very little control of what is advertised.  I would be really interested to see how this comes out, if they continue to pursue it.

So, how do you get your videos into the search engines?  It’s not that difficult.  The search engines allow sites to submit video content in the form of an XML feed.  However, if not done properly, the videos probably won’t make it in to the index.  Each search engine has its own set of guidelines for content submission and format for the XML feed.  Also, with any kind of feed, the guidelines you see may not be the most up to date and your feed may be rejected for something they haven’t published yet.

An important thing to remember is that Google and other search engines are not very good at finding video on their own, let alone determining it’s content.  The only way you can depend on to get videos listed is to have them submitted, by someone who knows what they are doing.  Does that mean you have to hire a firm with gobs of video-specific experience?  Not really.  Since the underlying principals of organic SEO apply to video promotion, any seasoned pro SEO will be able to get great results.  Heck, selecting a firm with tons of video promotion experience might be a mistake in the long run.  I find that companies that specialize in one little niche of marketing tend lack the skills it takes to leverage the rest of the website’s marketing potential.  Your company may find that it’s “all-in” in one type of media or delivery method only to find that particular method evaporate overnight.  Then what?  If Google decides to move video results out of the organic results into their own set, will your company survive?  Will it be competitively placed in the remaining Google results?  If your video promotion partner doesn’t understand organic SEO and incorporate it into your campaign, then no.  You won’t be there.  Google flipped the switch one day putting video in the results… they can just as easily flip it off.

In conclusion, video content can be a powerful tool for your website’s success… if done correctly.  Currently there is such a huge opportunity for people to get it right because so many are getting it wrong.  Because of the increasing capabilities of computer hardware, and increasing bandwidth to homes, video is going to remain very powerful in the future, and may ultimately be the main focus of any internet marketing campaign.

Browser Ubiquity Testing

February 15th, 2010

Browser what?  Browser Ubiquity Testing is testing your site in popular web browsers to ensure that each visitor has the same experience on your website.  It’s a very important, yet often overlooked step.  I’m going to share some of my experience with you today and hopefully show you what you need if you want to be serious about Browser Ubiquity Testing.

First, it helps to have a Mac and an PC at your disposal.  Better still is to have a Mac and THREE PCs at your disposal.  Why?  You need the Mac to make sure that the popular Mac browsers render your site correctly.  You need three PCs because there are currently three Windows operating systems in the market, each with a fair share of users.  Why can’t you just use a Windows 7 machine with IE 8 for your testing?  Because it doesn’t render the same as IE 8 on XP or Vista.  You may hear that it’s all the same, but it’s just not.  Each OS has its own version of Flash, Java, Silverlight, etc.  Each performs just a bit different.  Each browser renders CSS differently.  Each browser also auto-corrects bad code differently.  If you designer or developer tells you your site will look right in all browsers, ask them to prove it to you.  Make them show you the browsers they’ve tested.  Ask about mobile.  Ask about a Mac.  Ask about XP, Vista and 7.  That’s like twenty two different browsers, and unless they are a fanatic about user-experience like me, they just haven’t done the work.

Let’s take a look at the browsers I use to test websites.

XP Vista 7 Mac
IE 7 IE 8 IE 8 Safari
IE 8 Firefox Firefox Firefox
Firefox Google Chrome Google Chrome Opera
Google Chrome Safari IE
Safari Opera iPhone Emulator
Opera Lynx
Lynx Blackberry Emulator

I use those different browsers on the different machines because each one renders a little bit differently.  I don’t care if someone says that Safari and Firefox share the same basic rendering engine, they aren’t 100%.  Sometimes you’ll see subtle differences on how things work on a site ie. how flash works in a browser, how it renders CSS, java, etc.

Don’t forget mobile browsers!  Mobile browsers do not see the site like everyone else.  I can’t tell you how frustrated I’ve been when trying to view a site from my phone only to find that the whole thing is coded in flash, or, even MORE frustrating is to find a flash navigation!  That just makes my blood boil.  I’ve got a client right now that had a big pretty flash slideshow on their homepage and some developer thought it was a good idea to nest their main navigation in the flash.  Not one user who came to the site on a mobile device could get past the front door, let alone see any content.  The simple solution is to write a bit of code to detect flash capabilities and deliver the right content to that browser.  “What?!  Content Delivery?!?!  Isn’t that cloaking???”  Calm down.  In this example it’s perfectly fine.  I know because I had a nice conversation with Matt Cutts about this a couple years ago at a Pubcon (Or SMX Advanced I can’t remember) and Mr. Cutts said that as long as the alternate content is in the same spirit as it’s fancy counterpart, it’s ok.  Oh, by the way, guess another browser that can’t see Flash very well… Googlebot.

When you find a difference in a browser, and you will, what can you do about it?  Some tools are available to help troubleshoot the code of the page to fix the problem.  99% of the time the issue is caused because a browser’s rendering engine decides that some code is “wrong” and then it makes a decision about how to “fix” it.  Since each browser’s rendering engine makes different decisions about how to fix the code it doesn’t like, it displays differently.  That’s when a tool like Firebug comes in handy.  Trouble is that it only works well in Firefox right now.  Not to worry, you can usually make the corrections in there and it’ll work for other browsers.  The reason the corrections will work in other browsers is because you are fixing problems that are messing up the rendering. The problems can be HTML issues, CSS hierarchy problems, etc.  Since you are fixing the code the browsers don’t have to decide how to do it for you, which is what messes up the page!

Unless you’re pretty technical, you might have some trouble fixing errant code.  Best to just test the site in the different browsers as possible, and tell your developer that there are problems, what they are, and even provide screenshots so they can figure it out.  Also, keep in mind that there are some issues with older versions of browsers because they just don’t render code correctly – even if the code is correct.  You should consult with your developer about how to fix this type of issue.  If they don’t know, find one that does.

Check your analytics.  Users come from all different operating systems with all different browsers and devices.  If they can’t get in your site because you haven’t done your due diligence, you’re not going to get their business.