Home Organic
Growth
Master
Planning
SEOMike™
Portfolio
Professional
Background
Personal
Background
SEOMike™
Blog
SEO
Services
 

Google Shows Less Than Ten Organic Results

March 16th, 2011

Today on Webmasterworld there was a discussion about Google showing fewer than 10 organic results for certain searches.  I did some checking and was able to see that in fact Google is showing fewer than ten results.  It looks like Google is experimenting with displaying other resources they think people may be interested in for certain searches.  At the time I checked, most “commercial” terms were unaffected.  However, if you were the number 10, or in some cases the number 9 result in the organic listings you may see your site dropped to page two which would have a huge impact on your traffic.  Numbers 9 and 10 don’t get a lot of traffic, but page two gets next to none.  If you had enough listings at the bottom of the first page that got dropped, you’d see a significant drop in traffic.  Every time I’ve seen Google experiment with adding things to the results, it eventually sticks.

Page 1 just got more competitive!

 

A search for the band "The Killers" produces 9 organic results.

A search for the band "The Killers" produces 9 organic results. (click the image for a larger view)

A search for the band called The Shins produces 8 organic results.

A search for the band called The Shins produces 8 organic results. (click the image for a larger view)

Internet Explorer 9 Is Here

March 15th, 2011

I installed IE just a few moments ago and was using it to create this post, however, I had to finish it with Chrome because IE9 got confused about inserting images.

Microsoft blatantly copied the look of Chrome and some of the features like the fact that each tab is an isolated individual process.  Overall the browser seems pretty good but be sure to check your own website to make sure that it works correctly in IE9 as a couple of my client’s sites do not.  One thing I find lacking is the fact that IE9 doesn’t underline misspelled words in red.  I also don’t like how crammed the tabs get since they are located directly to the right of the address bar.

One surprising thing is the fact that when I ran the Acid3 test to check IE9 and it consistently scored a 95/100.  I thought Microsoft made huge efforts to make the browser standards compliant! I thought the results must be wrong so I refreshed a few times and received the same score.  I was pretty sure I remembered other browsers doing better so I checked a few.  Chrome, Opera and Safari got 100/100 and Firefox got 97/100.

Finally, the big test.  Benchmarking.  I used FutureMark’s Pacekeeper for the tests.   I was surprised that out of the five browsers I tested on my computer, IE9 came in third.  My machine is a Quad Core Intel Q6600 running Windows 7 64 bit with 8 gigs of RAM.

Browser Benchmakrs

Benchmarks run on five browsers.

In true Internet Explorer fashion, IE9 just doesn’t live up to the hype.

SEOMike to Speak at Pubcon Vegas

March 15th, 2011

I am happy to announce that I’ve been selected to speak again at the 2011 Las Vegas Pubcon Conference.  It’s a huge honor to be chosen out of the hundreds of applicants and I am really looking forward to speaking at this event.

Pubcon Austin

March 14th, 2011

I recently spoke at Pubcon Austin and think it went pretty well.  I talked to around 45 people about the fundamentals of SEO, a topic that I think is very important and often overlooked.  Everyone is all about the latest and greatest SEO techniques and so many fail to complete an initial assessment and optimization of a website.  You can view a pdf of my presentation here: SEOMike Pubcon South Expert Spotlight.

I learned a ton from the sessions at the conference and one of the best presentations, as always, was by my friend Rob Snell.  The man is a genius.  I highly recommend you check out his presentation and transcript which you can find here: Rob Snell’s Pubcon Presentation on “Bottom to Top SEO of an Ecommerce Site

SEOMike Expert Spotlight at Pubcon

February 21st, 2011

I’m excited to announce that I’ll be featured in an Expert Spotlight at Pubcon South in Austin on March 8th.  I’ll be speaking about “SEO Entry Level – Rock Solid Basics” on March 8th.  I’m pretty excited to let people in on some of the thing I’ve learned over the years.

Some People Are Snakes

February 17th, 2011

A guy contacted me from what seemed to be a decent size company.  It was a company related to one of my DMOZ categories which is how he found me.  We had a couple of nice phone conversations which led to him asking for a proposal from me.  Since my proposals take about two hours to put together I scheduled it for the following week.  I put together my normal proposal with summaries of all the different points on the website that need correction along with costs for fixing the problems.  Of course my proposals also include an outline of ongoing SEO services and the associated fees.  When the potential client received the proposal he called back very annoyed that the proposal did not include every detail of my plan.  He said that he and his partner were disappointed in it and that it seemed to be a “templated proposal.”  In all my time of doing this, I’ve only heard that once before.  It was a company that was hiring their own inexperienced SEO to be in-house and wanted expert direction without paying for it.  My proposals are detailed enough for someone who is not executing the plan.  After quite a bit more talking it became quite apparent that all they wanted were instructions for an SEO campaign.  For example, I said that his HTML was invalid and that we’d correct that – he demanded to know how.  Not “how” like we’ll check the code with the W3C validator and make corrections, he wanted step-by-step instructions for interpreting the W3C reports and implementing the fixes.

While this strange discussion was going on they were also trying to get a DMOZ listing from me even though their site didn’t qualify for one because it was a thin affiliate site. (strictly lead-gen; collecting and selling applications)  They kept insinuating that if I gave them a DMOZ listing and the detailed proposal I would for sure get the contract.  It was pretty clear that they were just trying to get the DMOZ listing and steal my instructions then run.

I say all this for the benefit of less-experienced SEOs.  If someone pushes for in-depth details of exactly what you are going to do to help their site become more search engine and user friendly, put up a red flag in your mind.  I’m not saying that you should entirely obfuscate your plan, but don’t give a detailed how-to.  Let them know that you will be link-building, but don’t reveal your proprietary methods.

Pop-ups Are Patented Technology

January 10th, 2011

Did you know that pop-ups are actually patented technology?  I learned about this a few years ago when the owners of the patent started suing people for using their technology without a license.  Here is a link to the official patent for the technology filed with the US Patent Office.  The patent was originally filed by a company that called it “traffic control programming” which was meant to pop up (or under) a message when a user tried to exit a page.  You can thank Ideaflood, inc. for the technology that plagued and crashed computers throughout the early part of the century.  The moral of the story; if you have pop-ups, pop-unders, or floating notice boxes on your site, for any reason, you may face litigation from Ideaflood for unlicensed use of their technology because the patent awarded to them is so vague and far-reaching that any “traffic control” program could be construed as belonging to them.

Strategically Placed Faces Help Conversion

January 4th, 2011

I enjoy showing people why it’s important to include faces on websites near things that the want to highlight.  Studies show that the human eye is attracted to faces and those faces can have a profound effect on a person’s attitude about something.  Placing a smiling face near an item you want to highlight will increase the item’s exposure and make it more likely that  a user takes the action you want.  For example, if it is important to you that your users contact you, you should place a picture of a nice smiling person near the link to contact you.

Faces are so important to users that there have been several studies conducted about the effectiveness of faces on websites.  A technology developed by the military to track a soldier’s eye movement for weapons targeting was adapted to track a user’s eye on a web page and create what’s called a “heatmap” of their activity.  The hotter a region, the more people looked at it.  Below I will provide a couple of examples of how people look at web pages.

Below is an example of very effective image placement.  Notice that the heatmap has what looks like a couple of legs in the middle.  This can be attributed to how the human eye is attracted to the image.  Notice that both “legs” slant to the right from top to bottom.  This is because the user’s eye was attracted to the image from the top text and then pulled downward, then the users examined the text below the images.  If you have something important to promote, the item your’re promoting needs to be directly below the image because you can see that the users viewed the text directly below both images on the page.

Heatmap of a page with two strategically placed images

Heatmap of a page with two strategically placed images. (click for a larger version)

Below is an example of an article containing a face.  Notice that the person’s image has the most concentrated views.  The face brought the user’s eyes down from the title, the bold text underneath the image also attracted attention, then the users eye moved down to the “register now” link.  Notice that users mostly scanned the text of the article after reading the title.  This shows that a good “hook” is important in the title to entice the reader to go farther.

An example of the draw that a human face can have on a webpage.

An example of the draw that a human face can have on a webpage. (click for a larger version)

Below is an example of a giant “sale” image that went completely ignored.  The users likely saw it in their peripheral vision, saw that it said “sale”, knew that it was an advertisement, and ignored it.  Had they been attracted to the text of the giant sale notice at all, there would be some coloration in that area.  To make this more effective, they could have made the “sale” smaller, included a person’s image on the top left of the ad, and then the important message of “dvd’s from 4.99 directly below the image.

A big SALE ad shouting but going unheard.

A big SALE ad shouting but going unheard. (click for a larger version)

This brief discussion of strategically placing images on your website should serve as a good guide to get you started modifying your own pages.  Remember, the busier you make it, the more distractions there are from your main conversion goals, so choose your images and placement wisely.  The goal is to guide a user’s eye around a page to find what you want them to find.

Google Preview Will Affect Rankings

December 15th, 2010

As you are all aware, Google has implemented website previews in the results.  The previews show a screenshot of a site and will call out any text on the page related to your search query.  This makes onpage SEO even more important than before and also presents some unique challenges for websites with flash.

Google’s preview bot doesn’t obey the rules like Google’s normal bot.  The preview bot ignores robots.txt rules and disregards alternate flash displaying big blank chunks instead.   I am running a Google Preview test right now to show that a website can still have something show up in place of their flash piece even though Google won’t display the alternate content you define in SWFObject.  As soon as the page is cached and has a preview I will publish a post with the findings, the code that works, and the reason you cannot afford to ignore this “glitch” in Google’s Preview bot no matter how temporary it might be.

Merchant Reviews Now Affect Ranking

December 1st, 2010

Another facet of Google’s algorithm is being polished.  Google is now taking into account merchant reviews to determine whether or not a website deserves a good ranking.  They are looking at this metric because of an article published in the New York Times about a company that was being intentionally abusive to their customers because the bad reviews the customers were writing were generating links to the company and inflating their ranking.  This appalled Google so they did something about it.

Google considered several options to solve the problem.  One option discussed was using “sentiment analysis” to identify negative remarks in posts and make those posts count as negative votes for a company.  The problem with that, Google said, was that it would be extremely difficult to find political candidates because of all the dissenters.  Another option Google is considering is displaying merchant ratings alongside their results.  You can already see some of this happening in PPC ads, but they are talking about implementing it in the organic results.

What was Google’s solution?  Well, at this point it’s not exactly clear.  They understandably weren’t very forthcoming in their article about this problem.  Google rarely gives much insight in to exactly what is going on with their algorithm.

If you’re wondering how this applies to you, just think of the power this gives to your competitors.  If they are smart enough to launch a negative campaign – and do it in such a way that even the almighty Google can’t trace the source, then you’re in for a big hit in the rankings.  Very scary stuff especially when it’s first implemented and is open to gaming.  I don’t really see how anyone who is smart could be stopped no matter how sophisticated the algorithm gets.

What’s your company’s best bet?  Hire an expert SEO with a deep understanding of online reputation management and pay the RM “insurance.”  It can take three to four YEARS to recover after bad press and cost tens of thousands of dollars.